It's interesting hearing from your perspectives, since here in Texas, I hear quite the opposite.Here, in the buckle of the "Bible belt", we have a huge amount of traditional and 'blended' church services. True, the fastest growing churches are using contemporary services, but that's a direct reflection of the culture. There is a need for both traditional and contemporary.
What I find interesting is that there are two extremes, though, that seem to have developed.
One extreme is the contemporary churches removing anything traditional, including significant Bible study opportunities such as a "Sunday School". The truly successful contemporary churches, though, are wise to create today's modern alternatives, such as cell groups, home teams and men's/women's/singles Bible Study groups.
On the other extreme are the traditional churches who are so adamant about not being contemporary that they actually prefer to remain at their status quo. The danger, obviously, is that this completely ignores the Great Commission. Keepings traditional at the expense of drawing in new believers is just as perilous as contemporary churches not providing avenues for spiritual growth.
The key, as Jesus illustrated constantly, was balance. Our church, by all accounts a very contemporary church, still sings hymns and has an active Seniors ministry. Unfortunately, that's just not common.
I pray that you find a place you can call home, and do not allow anger to well up in your heart about the contemporary churches.
In Him,
Anthony