Worship Leaders by Ron Man Pastor of Music and Worship, EXW Contributor October 27, 2009

Like the tongue (James 3:9-10), music can be a force for great good and great evil. The latter can
occur when battle lines are drawn between the generations in the local church. Typically, the older
adults prefer more "traditional" church music (the standard hymns and gospel songs plus church
anthems of a bygone era), while the younger set leans toward choruses, praise and worship songs,
and a generally more upbeat style.

Churches take different approaches in dealing with this dichotomy:

1. The church goes almost exclusively in one direction (traditional or contemporary) based on
factors such as the congregation's history, its constituency, or the personal preferences of the
leadership. As a result the church keeps and attracts those whose personal tastes tend in that same
direction, while those whose preferences lie in the other direction gravitate toward other churches
where the music is more to their liking. At least this is what happens in larger towns where there are
a multiplicity of evangelical church choices - the towns end up with a variety of "specialty" churches
from among which one may select according to his or her liking; one goes to such a church if he or
she is looking for a particular kind of music. In smaller communities where a single evangelical
church may be the only real option, the results of musical specialization can be more problematic
yet, even tragic: a group within the church can feel alienated and disenfranchised with no alternative
solution. (This can also be the case when a well-established church makes a deliberate shift to a
new musical style, and long-standing members find themselves suddenly feeling like outsiders.)

2. In an attempt to address the very real differences in musical style preferences, more and more
churches are providing separate worship services, each with a very different flavor and musical
style. Very often this means starting a "contemporary service" to supplement an existing "traditional
service." Rather than forcing people to choose between different churches to find the approach to
worship which is meaningful to them, this approach has the laudable goal of providing, within a
single church body, worship experiences at both ends of the spectrum. But it must be asked
whether the unity in the body which this approach seeks to preserve is truly served in this way.
One may provide a way for these two constituent groups to meet inside the same set of walls; but
when they gather at different times for the regular corporate meeting of the church, and under such
diverse circumstances, are they not in reality more like two congregations than one? This approach
seems to accentuate the differences between the groups, to concede that "ne'er the twain shall
meet," and to miss out on the unifying potential of corporate worship.

3. It is possible to bring the generations into worship that is meaningful to all and truly expressive of
the oneness of all persons in the Body of Christ. God has led our church to gradually develop a
style of worship which manages to involve all ages and tastes in a way which is truly unifying.

* * * * *

While each church must find a form of worship which fits its particular mixture of people, gifts, and
resources, the following characteristics would seem to be important (if not essential) to the task:

Continue >>>

Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  Next

Printable Version
Email this Page to a Friend	Add Your Opinion

Be the first to add your opinion about this article. Click HERE Now!
Add Your Opinion